https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VEJRPx0yHM

Non seulement nos gouvernements mentent, réalisent des opérations sous fausses bannières ....mais, en plus, ils payent des équipes de COMMENTATEURS SOUS FAUSSES BANNIÈRES .

Agoravox n’est pas a l’abri de ce genre d’intoxication . Vous pouvez le constater sur ce post. 

Certains de ces agents poussent un peu trop la note. Parfois, ces agents se déguisent....aussi sous de fausses bannières :

.

.

.

Voici que nos ’’amis’’ de la C.I.A. s’amusent ferme a Moscou :

Les services secrets russes ont démantelé un réseau d’espionnage américain dont les agents se travestissaient pour brouiller les pistes et dissimuler leur identité, rapporte la chaîne russe NTV.

Deux dames distinguées se dirigeant au petit matin de l’ambassade américaine dans un café avoisinant ont attiré l’attention des agents russes qui ont aussitôt reconnu en elle Laure Karlson et son amie Janice, les femmes de deux agents secrets américains. Encore un détail frappant : Laure Karlson s’était emmitouflée dans une écharpe comme s’il faisait un froid de canard.
Navire de reconnaissance Iouri Ivanov

Après avoir rejoint le café, les deux femmes se sont séparées : Janice s’est précipitée dans les toilettes en laissant Mme Karlson patienter devant la porte des cabinets… La suite de l’histoire relève du roman policier.

La porte des cabinets s’ouvre et… un homme roux portant une casquette apparaît. C’est Timothy Finnegan en personne, un agent émérite de la CIA. L’homme s’en va, tandis que Laure Karlson entre dans les cabinets et ramasse tout ce qui est resté de la grande blonde : perruque, manteau, écharpe et masque imitant un visage humain. Au bout de quelques minutes, la femme rejoint deux hommes dans la salle principale du café. Ce sont Robert Hines et Steven Chisholm, agents de la CIA. Finnegan s’est déguisé en la femme de ce dernier cherchant à tromper les services secrets russes. Selon la chaîne, ce jour-là, il avait rendez-vous avec un agent de renseignement dont l’identité n’a pas encore été précisée.

D’après la chaîne, les deux espions américains (ou plutôt les deux espionnes ?) ne se doutaient même pas que les services de renseignement russes suivaient en direct leur petit jeu par le biais de caméras cachées.

================================================================

( Certainement, Edgar Hoover a été une inspiration pour toute l’agence ) 

Faut-il rappeler que le pompier DeMasi a transporté 3 des 4 boites noires-orange provenant des 2 avions qui ont été guidé vers les 2 tours jumelles de NY ? Les autorités n’ont pas publié le contenu .

Complicité lors d’un crime ? Quelqu’un ment. Morice n’aime pas les menteurs. Préparez-vous

ça vas faire mal ! 

One of the more puzzling mysteries of 9-11 is what ever happened to the flight recorders of the two planes that hit the World Trade Center towers. Now it appears that they may not be missing at all.

Counterpunch has learned that the FBI has them.

Flight recorders (commonly known as black boxes, though these days they are generally bright orange) are required on all passenger planes. There are always two-a flight data recorder that keeps track of a plane’s speed, altitude, course and maneuvers, and a cockpit voice recorder which keeps a continuous record of the last 30 minutes of conversation inside a plane’s cockpit. These devices are constructed to be extremely durable, and are installed in a plane’s tail section, where they are least likely suffer damaged on impact. They are designed to withstand up to 30 minutes of 1800-degree heat (more than they would have faced in the twin towers crashes), and to survive a crash at full speed into the ground.

All four of the devices were recovered from the two planes that hit the Pentagon and that crashed in rural Pennsylvania. In the case of American Airlines Flight 77, which hit the Pentagon, the FBI reports that the flight data recorder survived and had recoverable information, but the voice recorder was allegedly too damaged to provide any record. In the case of United Airlines Flight 93, which hit the ground at 500 mph in Pennsylvania, the situation was reversed : the voice recorder survived but the flight data box was allegedly damaged beyond recovery.

But the FBI states, and also reported to the 9-11 Commission, that none of the recording devices from the two planes that hit the World Trade Center were ever recovered.

There has always been some skepticism about this assertion, particularly as two N.Y. City firefighters, Mike Bellone and Nicholas De Masi, claimed in 2004 that they had found three of the four boxes, and that Federal agents took them and told the two men not to mention having found them. (The FBI denies the whole story.) Moreover, these devices are almost always located after crashes, even if not in useable condition (and the cleanup of the World Trade Center was meticulous, with even tiny bone fragments and bits of human tissue being discovered so that almost all the victims were ultimately identified). As Ted Lopatkiewicz, director of public affairs at the National Transportation Safety Agency which has the job of analyzing the boxes’ data, says, “It’s very unusual not to find a recorder after a crash, although it’s also very unusual to have jets flying into buildings.”

Now there is stronger evidence that something is amiss than simply the alleged non-recovery of all four of those boxes. A source at the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency that has the task of deciphering the date from the black boxes retrieved from crash sites-including those that are being handled as crimes and fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI-says the boxes were in fact recovered and were analyzed by the NTSB.

“Off the record, we had the boxes,” the source says. “You’d have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.”

The official word from the NTSB is that the WTC crash site black boxes never turned up. “No recorders were recovered from the World Trade Center,” says the NTSB’s Lopatkiewicz. “At least none were delivered to us by the FBI.” He adds that the agency has “always had a good relationship’ with the FBI and that in all prior crime-related crashes or flight incidents, they have brought the boxes to the NTSB for analysis.

For its part, the FBI is still denying everything, though with curious bit of linguistic wiggle room. “To the best of my knowledge, the flight recording devices from the World Trade Center crashes were never recovered. At least we never had them,” says FBI spokesman Stephen Kodak.

What the apparent existence of the black boxes in government hands means is unclear.

If the information in those boxes is recoverable, or if, as is likely, it has been recovered already, it could give crucial evidence regarding the skill of the hijacker/pilots, perhaps of their strategy, of whether they were getting outside help in guiding them to their targets, of how fast they were flying and a host of other things.

Why would the main intelligence and law enforcement arm of the U.S. government want to hide from the public not just the available information about the two hijacked flights that provided the motivation and justification for the nation’s “War on Terror” and for its two wars against Afghanistan and Iraq, but even the fact that it has the devices which could contain that information ? Conspiracy theories abound, with some claiming the planes were actually pilotless military aircraft, or that they had little or nothing to do with the building collapses. The easiest way to quash such rumors and such fevered thinking would be openness.

Instead we have the opposite : a dark secrecy that invites many questions regarding the potentially embarrassing or perhaps even sinister information that might be on those tapes.

DAVE LINDORFF

Alors, finalement ,avez vous retrouvé les 2 moteurs du Boeing ayant prétendument heurté le Pentagone ?

Allons, n’hésitez pas a vous ridiculiser, vous êtes anonymes ici !

’’...et tous les contrôleurs radar remplacés par des agents de la CIA...’’

J’espère que c’est de l’humour. Dans le cas contraire, tel andromede95, nous gaspillons des fonds publics pour financer ce genre d’opération COINTELPRO. Un tel niveau d’incompétence, c’est peu commun.