Signaler un abus

Pourquoi ressortir une affaire présumée de traffic d’organes vieille de 17 ans ? A qui profite l’agitation faite autour de cette histoire dont on ne possède pour l’instant aucune preuve scientifique ?

 Les intérêts de DIAKONIA, une ONG chrétienne financée en majorité par le gouvernement suédois qui soutient tout ce qui est anti israélien pour garder la main mise sur Jérusalem et Bethléem, l’essentiel de la « Terre sainte ».

Les chrétiens ont toujours joué les palestiniens contre les israéliens pour garder leurs biens et le contrôle de ce qu’ils nomment « la Terre sainte » en évitant de mentionner Israël.

Le foncier de Jérusalem appartient majoritairement depuis l’Empire ottoman à l’église orthodoxe du patriarcat de Constantinople. L’église catholique romaine, à travers son hôpital de Bethléem accouche la majorité des femmes palestiniennes.

Il semble évident que les Chrétiens ont tout intérêt à soutenir les revendications des Palestiniens pour rester maitres du jeu.

Texte repris du site de NGO Monitor

August 25, 2009

• Diakonia is Sweden’s largest humanitarian NGO, founded in 1966 by five Swedish churches. It receives most of its budget from the Swedish government (SIDA, SEK 332 million, $47.2 million
.....................................

Diakonia is more a lobby group with a clear political agenda for the Middle East than a Christian aid organization....In one single month, October 2008, Diakonia sponsored 10 articles in the Swedish media, nine of which dealt with the world’s only Jewish country.
(Ilya Meyer, Equal value of all human life ?, Jerusalem Post, December 6,

...................................................................... ......
Funding

In 2008, Diakonia’s revenue exceeded SEK 367 million ( $47.2 million), of which SEK 332 million came from the Swedish government’s International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), SEK 10.5 million from the EU, and SEK 5 million from the Norwegian government. Activities in the Middle East, Central America, and South America each comprise about 14% of Diakonia’s budget, while spending in Asia is 25%, and 30% in Africa. Advocacy work (primarily political lobbying in Sweden) is about 3% of Diakonia’s budget.

..............................................
Debate in Sweden over Efficacy of International aid and Funding Conflict

In September 2008, Swedish journalist Bengt Nilsson published a book, Sweden Finances Wars in Africa. Nilsson claimed that Swedish aid was used to provide a “lucrative market for astute political leaders and guerilla movements.” The book sparked an intense debate in the Swedish press and aid community over the efficacy of development and humanitarian aid activities. Diakonia claims to have been impacted by this debate “politically and externally.” Nilsson’s conclusions, that humanitarian aid can have unintended consequences, and can even fuel conflicts, without proper oversight, are consistent with NGO Monitor’s research into the impact of funding for “human rights” NGOs active in the Israeli-Arab conflict – in particular Diakonia and its partner organizations.

Diakonia & the Middle East

Diakonia has been operating in the Middle East since the 1960s, and opened its first office in the region in 1989. It runs programs in Egypt, Kurdish Iraq, Lebanon, Israel, and “Palestine.” Diakonia’s goals for the region are to “concentrate […] on addressing the lack of peace and security, increasing respect of human rights and eradicating the multidimensional aspects of poverty.”

Diakonia’s Position Paper on Israel/Palestine

“Israel/Palestine” is a “priority area” for Diakonia – one of only two country-specific priority areas (the other is “Congo-Kinshasa”). In conjunction with its work, Diakonia has issued a “Position Paper on Israel & Palestine.” This policy paper appears to be the only country-specific paper issued by Diakonia, and presents a vision for a “viable two state solution” and to “not take side with any of the parties in the conflict.” The organization claims to want “an honest analysis of the causes of the current humanitarian crisis and we need an understanding of the structural problems behind them.”

I..........................................
 
The views expressed in this policy document contribute to and reflect the one-sided activities of the organization.

Diakonia’s Activities in the Arab-Israeli Conflict

.......................................

Many of Diakonia’s partner organizations for these projects – including Al Mezan, Al Haq, the Alternative Information Center, and Sabeel – are among the most extreme anti-Israel NGOs operating the region, employing inflammatory and at times, antisemitic and “Nazi” rhetoric. Other partners, such as B’Tselem, HaMoked, and PHR-I have been widely criticized for their one-sided reporting and problems with credibility. This aspect of Diakonia’s activities works against peace and normalization in the region, further entrenching the conflict.