Citoyenrené : « la preuve que
le récit officiel est bidon a été apportée par les 2 présidents de ladite
commission « mis en place pour échouer »
vous défendez une VO bidon
d’après Kean et Hamilton »
Pour un « échec », c’est plutôt
bizarre, le rapport de la Commission 911 a été largement publié, y compris sur
http://www.9-11commission.gov/
Et puis là encore, tu ne fais
que reprendre des poncifs conspirationnistes, basés sur des déclarations que tu
t’empresses d’interpréter dans le sens de tes convictions personnelles.
Hamilton pensait (à l’imparfait
!) que le travail de la Commission 911 était voué à l’échec. Extrait de
l’interview de Hamilton http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911hamilton.html :
” ....Solomon : You write.. the first chapter of
the book is ’the Commission was set up to fail.’ - my goodness, for the critics - who suggest that it was indeed set up to fail as some kind of obfuscation -
you certainly dangled a juicy piece of bait out there in the river. Why do you
think you were set up to fail ?
Hamilton : Well, for a number of reasons : Tom
Kean and I were substitutes - Henry Kissinger and George Mitchell were the
first choices ; we got started late ; we had a very short time frame - indeed, we
had to get it extended ; we did not have enough money - 3 million dollars to
conduct an extensive investigation. We needed more, we got more, but it took us
a while to get it.
We had a lot of skeptics out there, who really
did not want the Commission formed. Politicians don’t like somebody looking
back to see if they made a mistake.
The Commission had to report right, just a few
days before the Democratic National Convention met, in other words, right in
the middle of a political campaign. We had a lot of people strongly opposed to
what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people.
We knew the history of commissions ; the history of commissions were they.. nobody
paid much attention to ’em....
So there were all kinds of reasons we thought
we were set up to fail. We decided that if we were going to have any success,
we had to have a unanimous report, otherwise the Commission report would simply
be filed....”