• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile

Signaler un abus

Renaud Bouchard 10 novembre 2016 09:21
Renaud Bouchard


A tous les lecteurs.

Afin de corriger l’affirmation qui tendrait à accréditer le fait qu’Hillary Clinton aurait eu le vote populaire et que - hélas - le décompte des grands électeurs lui aurait « volé » sa victoire, on trouvera ci-après une analyse intéressante montrant la répartition géographique de l’électorat républicain :

https://mishtalk.com/2016/11/09/trumps-geographic-landslide/

Donald Trump won the presidency, but Hillary won the Popular Vote by a margin of 206,379 or so.

That fact caused Simon Rosenberg, a veteran Democratic strategist and the president of the NDN think tank to moan about a Democratic Party in Crisis.

“We are the only democracy in the developed world where if you win more votes you don’t control the government and the legislature. There is not a wholesale rejection of the Democratic party and the Democratic brand, that’s not what happened last night despite the fact we now have less power than we’ve had since 1928.”

Let’s investigate Rosenberg’s complaint another way.

Geographic Landslide

Geographically speaking, Trump won at least 80% of the Nation. The only states Hillary carried are Vermont, Massachusetts, and Connecticut.

Trump won every county in Oklahoma and West Virginia. Trump won all but one county in Wyoming, and Kansas. Trump won all but two counties in North Dakota, Kentucky, Tennessee, Utah, and Nebraska.

Nearly the entire state of Minnesota, Illinois, New York, Oregon, Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, Michigan, etc., went for Trump.

Geographically speaking, except for big cities and a few isolated areas, the country cannot stand Hillary.

Lire le commentaire dans son contexte
Répondre Signaler un abus



Palmarès