• AgoraVox sur Twitter
  • RSS
  • Agoravox TV
  • Agoravox Mobile

Renaud Bouchard

Renaud Bouchard

Juriste - Géopoliticien - Economiste (CEMI-EHESS) - Français et Européen -Passionné par les relations internationales et la diplomatie de crise, l'action politique et citoyenne. J'ai la volonté de rencontrer, réunir et fédérer les énergies pour un engagement et une renaissance politique nouvelles de la France et de l'Europe à l'occasion des prochaines échéances électorales.

Tableau de bord

  • Premier article le 08/09/2006
  • Modérateur depuis le 16/11/2006
Rédaction Depuis Articles publiés Commentaires postés Commentaires reçus
L'inscription 318 4475 17287
1 mois 0 0 0
5 jours 0 0 0
Modération Depuis Articles modérés Positivement Négativement
L'inscription 1037 1037 0
1 mois 0 0 0
5 jours 0 0 0

Ses articles classés par : ordre chronologique













Derniers commentaires



  • Renaud Bouchard Renaud Bouchard 4 novembre 2015 00:42

    Aux Lecteurs
    Dernières nouvelles Mercredi 04 novembre oh40

    Now, Russian media says that according to an Egyptian forensic expert, victims’ injuries seem to point to a mid-air explosion. Here’s Sputnik :

    According to an Egyptian forensic expert, an analysis of injuries sustained by victims of the Russian airliner crash on Saturday in Egypt shows that a mid-air explosion might have occured aboard the Airbus A321 passenger jet, RIA Novosti reported.

     

    On October 31, an Airbus A321 operated by the Russian airline Kogalymavia crashed in the Sinai Peninsula en route to St. Petersburg from the Egyptian resort city of Sharm El-Sheikh. The tragedy has become the largest civilian aircraft disaster in Russian and Soviet history.

     

    « A large number of body parts may indicate that a powerful explosion took place aboard the plane before it hit the ground, » said an Egyptian forensic expert who took part in the examination of the bodies of the A321 crash victims.

     

    According to the expert, a DNA analysis would be needed to identify the victims of the Russian airliner crash in Egypt.

    In no uncertain terms : the fact that there were body parts scattered in an 8 kilometer radius is all you need to know about what caused the plane to crash.

    Still, Egypt’s civil aviation ministry says there’s as yet no « proof » to support Moscow’s claims that the plane broke apart. Here’s Reuters : 

    Spokesman Mohamed Rahmi said there was no proof yet that the plane had broken up in flight. "This could be a long process and we can’t talk about the results as we go along,” he said.

    Well, sure you can, and a lot of people are. Despite Rahmi’s contention that no evidence exists that the plane exploded (you know, other than the video from the terrorists which shows it exploding and the testimony of a forensic expert), he did confirm that no distress call was received from the pilot :

    “No communication from the pilot was recorded at the navigation centers requesting anything,” he told Reuters.

    We’ll close with the following from Bloomberg and leave it to readers to draw their own conclusions given everything noted above :

    More than a decade before it burst into pieces mid-air, the Russian jetliner that crashed in Egypt on Saturday scraped its tail on a runway during landing and needed to be repaired.

     

    Investigators poring over wreckage of the Metrojet Airbus Group SE A321 in Egypt’s Sinai peninsula will be taking a close look at a 2001 repair to the plane’s tail because it is one of the few things known to cause the type of sudden midair breakup that occurred Saturday, said John Goglia, a former airline mechanic who served on the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board.

     

    “If the engineering is done right, it’s not an issue. If the repair follows the engineering data, it’s not an issue,” said Goglia, who isn’t involved in the Metrojet investigation. “But a breakdown in any one of those can and has resulted in catastrophic failures.”

     

    While it may take years for a repair to eventually crack enough to fail, that can lead to a violent explosion damaging an aircraft, according to accident reports.

     

    Such a failure occurred in 2002 when China Airlines Flight 611 flying from Taiwan to Hong Kong broke apart at the spot where the Boeing Co. 747’s tail was repaired 22 years earlier.

     

    Japan Airlines Flight 123 hit a mountain in 1985 after a similar repair came apart, claiming 520 lives. When the repair let loose, it blew off the vertical fin rising out of the tail. Without that fin, the plane couldn’t be controlled.



  • Renaud Bouchard Renaud Bouchard 3 novembre 2015 17:09

    @Pyrathome
    Cui bono ? Nous ne savons pas encore.Patience.



  • Renaud Bouchard Renaud Bouchard 3 novembre 2015 17:04

    @Hijack
    Je partage votre analyse.



  • Renaud Bouchard Renaud Bouchard 3 novembre 2015 17:03

    @oscar fortin
    Merci.



  • Renaud Bouchard Renaud Bouchard 3 novembre 2015 17:02

    @Elliot
    Une complète recomposition est effectivement en cours qui risque fort de déboucher :
    -Sur une guerre civile ouverte en Turquie, compliquée par le fait que la Turquie est « membre » de l’OTAN mais que Américains et russes la verraient bien éclater avec la naissance d’un Kurdistan.
    -Sur une partition de l’Arabie Saoudite, engluée dans son Viet-Nam yémenite et en perte de vitesse sur les autres fronts sunnites.
    Les jeux sont faits avec l’alliance russo-iranienne.

Voir tous ses commentaires (20 par page)

LES THEMES DE L'AUTEUR

Tribune Libre

Publicité


Publicité



Palmarès

Publicité


Agoravox.tv