Au lieu de faire vos procès d’intention sur mon supposé mépris des moins riches ou le fait que je trouverai péjoratif le terme de solidarité, la franchise aurait consisté à répondre à la question de savoir à quelle tranche d’impôts vous vous situez. Cela aurait éclairé le débat.
C’est dommage de ne pas répondre, on risque d’intreprêter faussement votre situation.
Quant au risque de se faire piquer encore plus de pognon, figurez vous que nous avons les moyens déviter ces désagréments.
Je pense que vous n’avez pas regardé le lien que je vousai donné, qui contrairement à ce que vous dites, ne donne pas les taux d’impôsition mais la distribution des nombres de foyers fiscaux par tranche de revenu fiscal.
Comme vous le dites avec le mépris qui vous cacactérise, j’aurai du éviter de vous donner ce lien que j’auri du garder pour le simple « commun des mortels » que vous êtes loin de pouvoir prétendre être.
Ceci dit, si vous pensez qu’augmenter les impôts des plus riches soit la solution aux problèmes, je vous laisse en persuader le « commun des mortels ».
Vous faite sans doute partie des petits payeurs d’impôts on n’en payant pas du tout (46% des foyers n’en paient pas) et c’est, sans doute, à ce titre que vous souhaitez que ce soient les autres qui en paient plus.
Je fais partie des 7% de foyers fiscaux payant le plus d’impôts (tranche à 40% + ISF).
Effectivement, ce blog allemand et cette video daily motion me semblent autrement plus sérieux que le site officiel des Nations Unies.
Par ailleurs, la réaction du Secrétaire Général des Nations Unis aux propos racistes du Président d’Iran et donné dans le site des Nations Unis est totalement bidon !!!!
MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD, President of Iran, said over the last centuries, humanity had gone through tremendous sufferings and pains. Had lessons been learned from these oppressions, horrors and the crimes of the two World Wars, there would have been a ray of hope for the future.
The victorious powers called themselves the conquerors of the world, while ignoring or down-treading the rights of other nations by the imposition of oppressive laws and arrangements.
Following World War Two, many proponents of racism resorted to military aggression to make an entire nation homeless, on the pretext of Jewish sufferings and the ambiguous and dubious question of the holocaust. They helped to bring to power the most cruel and repressive racists in Palestine. It was all the more regrettable that a number of Western Governments and the United States had committed themselves to defend these racist perpetrators of genocide, while the awakened conscience and free-minded people of the world condemned the Zionist crimes of aggression, carnage and other brutalities of bombardments of civilians in Gaza. So long as Zionist domination continued, many countries, Governments and nations would never be able to enjoy freedom, independence and security.
What were the root causes of United States attacks against Iraq or the invasion of Afghanistan, Mr. Ahmadinejad asked. For a long time, inequitable economic regulations had been imposed by political powers on the international economy, with a financial and a monetary system imposed without proper international oversight mechanisms.
Racism was rooted in lack of knowledge concerning the truth of human existence as the selected creature of God. Racism was the symbol of ignorance which had deep roots in history, and was indeed a sign of frustration in developments of human society. It was therefore crucially important to trace the manifestations of racism in situations or in societies where ignorance or lack of knowledge prevailed.
The international community should initiate collective moves to raise awareness in the afflicted societies, where ignorance of racism still prevailed, so as to bring a halt to the spread of these malicious manifestations.
Today the human community was facing a kind of racism which had tarnished the image of humanity.
World Zionism personified racism that falsely resorted to religion and abused religious sentiments to hide hatred and ugly faces. Boycotting such a session as this was a true indication of supporting the blatant example of racism.
The world was going through fundamental changes. Power relations had become weak and fragile, and the sound of cracks in the pillars of world oppression could now be heard.
The inequitable and unjust management of the world was now at the end of the road.
This deadlock was inevitable since the logic of this imposed management was oppressive. Western liberalism, like communism, had reached its end, since it had failed to perceive the truth of the world. It was absolutely possible to improve the existing situation in the world, but this could be only achieved through the cooperation of all countries in order to get the best out of the existing capacities of the world.